Site icon Porter Analysis

Porter Five Forces Model (Porter Analysis) of Microsoft

<p align&equals;"justify">Microsoft Corporation is a multinational technology company based in the USA in Redmond&comma; Washington&period; It was established by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in 1975 in New Mexico&period; It manufactures&comma; develops&comma; licenses&comma; sells&comma; and supports consumer electronics&comma; computer software&comma; personal computers&comma; and other services&period; It is most famous for its operating system Microsoft Windows&comma; Microsoft Office suite&comma; Internet Explorer and the Edge web browsers&period; Its renowned hardware products include the Xbox game console and tablet lineup Microsoft Surface&period; It is the world’s largest software maker with respect to revenue and is also one of the most valuable companies in the world&period; Microsoft has progressed rapidly since its inception and also made a large number of acquisitions such as Skype and LinkedIn&period; In 2016&comma; its revenue was more than &dollar;85 billion&period; Microsoft has a workforce of 114&comma;000 employees&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Following is a detailed Porter Five Forces Model Analysis of Microsoft&colon;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Competitive Rivalry – High<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">Although Microsoft is the pioneer in many of the technologies of personal computers&comma; the today’s electronics industry is very competitive&period; Many of the products such as operating systems and other software are now also being made by others companies that provide the same level of features that Microsoft does&period; The competition today in this industry is in the rate of innovation and the marketing campaigns&period; Players in the industry have made huge investments in the research and development facilities in order to be the most innovative in the industry&period; There is a certain level of customer loyalty&period; E&period;g&period; the users of Windows operating system MS Office will not easily switch to other software as they have become accustomed to these software and developed proficiency in their use&period; However&comma; the competitive rivalry is high for Microsoft&period;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Threat of New Entrants – Medium<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">In the software business of Microsoft&comma; the threat of new entrants is low&period; The entry barriers are high&period; Designing and developing enterprise software is very expensive&period; Its success takes a lot of time&period; Also&comma; there is a lack of people who have such proprietary knowledge&period; The existing players have established absolute cost advantage as a result of their extensive experience and economies of scale&period; Brand loyalty also plays a role&period; However&comma; in the hardware sector&comma; many new companies have been able to grow and capture a small share of the market such as in the field of personal computer&comma; video game consoles&comma; tablets&comma; and others&period; They are still on the small scale but have been successful &lpar;Chauhan&comma; 2014&rpar;&period; Thus&comma; the threat of new entrants is of a moderate level&period;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Bargaining Power of Suppliers – Low<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">Companies in this industry do not have many suppliers&period; E&period;g&period; software is an intangible product that is developed in house&period; The suppliers supply the components for the making of the hardware products such as tablets&comma; game consoles etc&period; These suppliers are large in number&period; Suppliers feel a prestige to be labeled as the suppliers of Microsoft&period; The supplier switching cost is also low &lpar;Weng&comma; 2012&rpar;&period; Therefore&comma; the suppliers are not in a position to bargain or influence prices&period; The bargaining power of suppliers is low against Microsoft&period;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Bargaining Power of Buyers – Moderate<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">The buyers which are making use of software made by Microsoft will not easily switch to the software of the competitor&comma; although it performs the same function&period; The reason is that there is a switching cost as the customers have become fluent with the software of Microsoft and can use them very efficiently&period; Moving onto new software requires time to adapt which they do not want to give &lpar;Littlepage&comma; 2014&rpar;&period; Thus&comma; buyers will continue to use them even if Microsoft slightly raises their prices&period; This is not the case for hardware products&period; Buyers switching cost is very low&comma; a lot of variety in the market&comma; and ease of adoption of new products makes the bargaining power of buyers high&period; Overall&comma; the bargaining power of buyers is of a moderate level&period;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h3 align&equals;"justify">Threat of Substitutes – Low<&sol;h3>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">The substitutes of software are manual writing and record keeping&comma; which have become obsolete now&period; The substitute of hardware products such as a tablet is to use a writing pad&semi; carry a camera&comma; a counter&comma; and devices that perform the functions a table does&period; This is impractical&period; Thus&comma; there is no threat of substitution against Microsoft&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">References<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p>&NewLine;Chauhan&comma; C&period;&comma; 2014&period; Strategic Analysis of Microsoft Corp&period; &lpar;2014&rpar;&period; &lbrack;Online&rsqb; Available at&colon; <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;slideshare&period;net&sol;chinmayschauhan&sol;strategic-analysis-for-microsoft-2014">https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;slideshare&period;net&sol;chinmayschauhan&sol;strategic-analysis-for-microsoft-2014<&sol;a> &lbrack;Accessed 14 July 2017&rsqb;&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Littlepage&comma; B&period;&comma; 2014&period; Porter&&num;8217&semi;s 5 Forces&period; &lbrack;Online&rsqb; Available at&colon; <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;prezi&period;com&sol;kh5iio0xr41&lowbar;&sol;porters-5-forces&sol;">https&colon;&sol;&sol;prezi&period;com&sol;kh5iio0xr41&lowbar;&sol;porters-5-forces&sol;<&sol;a> &lbrack;Accessed 14 July 2017&rsqb;&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;Weng&comma; C&period;&comma; 2012&period; Porter&&num;8217&semi;s 5 Forces Analysis &&num;8211&semi; Microsoft&sol;Xbox&period; &lbrack;Online&rsqb; Available at&colon; <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;prezi&period;com&sol;0dy0okgn4q86&sol;porters-5-forces-analysis-microsoftxbox&sol;">https&colon;&sol;&sol;prezi&period;com&sol;0dy0okgn4q86&sol;porters-5-forces-analysis-microsoftxbox&sol;<&sol;a> &lbrack;Accessed 14 July 2017&rsqb;&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">&NewLine;

Exit mobile version