Site icon Porter Analysis

Porter’s Five Forces Model of Xerox

<p align&equals;"justify">Xerox is a public corporation founded as a document processing company which markets&comma; services and supports a large range of products globally to make the office environment more efficient and productive&period; Headquartered in Norwalk&comma; Connecticut in USA&comma; the company came into being in the 20th century by Chester Carlson &lpar;who invented xerography&rpar; and Joseph C&period; Wilson&period; The company offers a wide range of products including photocopiers&comma; black and white and colored printers&comma; fax machines&comma; projectors and other displays etc&period; &lpar;Adam&comma; 2011&rpar;The corporation was leading the market in 1970s with its advanced technology and tremendous quality of products&period; &lpar;Xerox&comma; n&period;d&period;&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Competition in the Industry<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">&NewLine;There are numerous factors in which Xerox faces competition&period; For example&semi; endorsement of brand&comma; research and development&comma; innovation&comma; quality and economies of scale&period; Its main competitors include Cannon&comma; Hewlett-Packard &lpar;HP&rpar;&comma; Ricoh and IKON&period; Xerox’s growth over the market is fast and constant&period; Due to its higher concentration in the industry&comma; large companies like Xerox can exert their power to demand their competitive desires and can afford to compete its opponents on the basis of its Research &amp&semi; Development rather than prices&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">In 2006&comma; Xerox invested US&dollar;761 million in its R&amp&semi;D to improve its business and lower the cost for the consumers&period; It spent US&dollar;922 million to support its new production and gain the current market share&period; With investment so high&comma; the competition becomes low&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">Due to the presence of learning economies of scale&comma; Xerox and Cannon has advantage over HP which is struggling to attain the technology they already have due to longer presence in the market&period; So the rivalry among the industry is quite low&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Potential on New Entrants in the Industry<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">There are very large barriers to the newcomers in the industry which relies on technology and its advancement&period; There are very few companies that can enter and survive the expensive market which is based on product differentiation i&period;e&period; the market of generally similar products with slight variation in technology&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">The new entrants would also face low competition among the existing companies which is another barrier in their success&period; The Individuals looking forward to enter the market would have to deal with the first mover advantage as well&comma; which includes abiding the trading rules set by the US government which the existing companies already know&period; Then there are legal factors that include knowing the current policies of the countries you are in trade with&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Power of Suppliers<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">With the market’s dependency on technology&comma; the demand and supply of the company is highly subjected to market fluctuations and competition within the market&period; It is in best interest of the both the supplier and the company to relinquish any sort of hold they have on each other so they have the flexibility to expand and switch&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<br &sol;>&NewLine;The technology market has several suppliers which can produce the undifferentiated products&period; The presence of multiple suppliers allows the company to use more than one supplier in the industry which makes the power of suppliers considerably low&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Power of Buyers<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">As far as the power of buyer is considered&comma; it varies with the price sensitivity i&period;e&period; at more differentiated products&semi; the company has the upper hand to exert the power on the buyer which is looking for the specific technology&period; Here the relative bargaining power is low&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">However&comma; when company is in the market of highly commoditized products and personalized products&comma; the buyer hold the majority of the shares in the power&period; For example&comma; if a person is buying a printer to support his college assignments&comma; he can compromise on the quality while opting for a cheaper substitute&period; Here the company has to be flexible in its prices so as not lose its consumers to its competitors&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;&period; The bargaining power of buyer goes hand in hand with the price sensitivity&period; It can be said that Xerox faces the moderate power of buyers in the industry&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Threat of Substitute Products<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">The threat of low end substitute products is always going to be existent in the document management industry&period; With the rapid advancement of technology&comma; people are willing to compromise on the quality of the personalized copiers if the price is affordable&period; The high end substitute products which offers a large variety of services gets threatened by the other high quality products on larger demands i&period;e offices etc&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<br &sol;>&NewLine;As a result&comma; the company faces the mixed threat of substitution in the market of document management&period;&NewLine;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Conclusion<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"justify">Considering the market of document management&comma; there are very few hindrances in the successful market growth of Xerox Company&period; With its investment in the right places&comma; the company would always be in the market with new technology to attract and expand its clientele&period; However&comma; if things go south in the document management industry in general&comma; Xerox including other companies can easily pack up and switch their businesses due to no government regulations and little specialized equipment which would prevent them from switching otherwise&period; &lpar;Moore&comma; 2007&rpar;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 align&equals;"justify">Bibliography<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p align&equals;"left">&NewLine;• Adam&period; &lpar;2011&comma; August 05&rpar;&period; Xerox Corporation SWOT Analysis&period; Retrieved from Free SWOT Analysis&colon; <a href&equals;"http&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;freeswotanalysis&period;com&sol;information-technology-swot&sol;240-xerox-corporation-swot-analysis&period;html">http&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;freeswotanalysis&period;com&sol;information-technology-swot&sol;240-xerox-corporation-swot-analysis&period;html<&sol;a><br &sol;>&NewLine;• Moore&comma; M&period; E&period; &lpar;2007&rpar;&period; Xerox Corporation Valutation Report &period; <br &sol;>&NewLine;• Xerox&period; &lpar;n&period;d&period;&rpar;&period; Retrieved from Xerox&colon; <a href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;xerox&period;com&sol;en-us&sol;about">https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;xerox&period;com&sol;en-us&sol;about<&sol;a><&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version